Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
91
out 100
VS
66
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G, Manufactured in January, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
- Lighter design: 204.5g vs 228g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1220x2712 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (30-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 2000 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 96.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 120 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.36 mm (6.39 in) | 161.4 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 75.92 mm (2.99 in) | 74.2 mm (2.92 in) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 in) | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 204.5 g (7.21 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- White - Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 3630 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | MediaTek APU 650 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G610 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 1130 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 1145 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2848 | 1119 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8363 | 2690 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24447 | n/a |
| CPU | 600293 | 242812 |
| GPU | 1194784 | 180896 |
| Memory | 408283 | 155997 |
| UX | 443652 | 170927 |
| NanoReview Score | 2647012 | 750632 |
| Stability | 55 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 112 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 18771 | n/a |
| Writing score | 24851 | n/a |
| Web score | 14035 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5794 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 13748 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 15826 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | n/a | 39 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 120 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (73% in 30 min) | Yes (67% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:46 h | 0:25 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:47 h | 07:52 h |
| Video Playback | 16:41 h | 11:32 h |
| Games | 07:44 h | 05:27 h |
| Standby Mode | 85 h | 89 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 16384x12288 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Digital (lossless), 4x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 200 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | n/a |
| Focal length | 85 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 60 |
| Preview | n/a | 64 |
| Zoom | n/a | 109 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | Omnivision OV16A1Q |
| Sensor size | 1/3.42 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | September, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | January, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 847 | 449 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 120 W |
Note
Vivo X200 Pro:
The black model is thinner (8.2) and lighter (223g).
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G:
The eco-leather version is 5.5 grams lighter than the regular one.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
