Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
91
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G, Manufactured in January, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5110mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
- Lighter design: 190g vs 228g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 2000 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1 % | 87.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.3 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 60 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 2 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.36 mm (6.39 in) | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 75.92 mm (2.99 in) | 75.7 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 3630 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 144 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 274 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2848 | 954 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8363 | 2281 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24447 | n/a |
| CPU | 600293 | 153134 |
| GPU | 1194784 | 49908 |
| Memory | 408283 | 112926 |
| UX | 443652 | 137675 |
| NanoReview Score | 2647012 | 453643 |
| Stability | 55 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 112 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 18771 | n/a |
| Writing score | 24851 | n/a |
| Web score | 14035 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5794 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 13748 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 15826 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| OS Size | n/a | 36 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5110 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (73% in 30 min) | Yes (60% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:46 h | 1:02 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:47 h | 09:19 h |
| Video Playback | 16:41 h | 12:35 h |
| Games | 07:44 h | 05:34 h |
| Standby Mode | 85 h | 89 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Samsung S5KHM6 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 200 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | n/a |
| Focal length | 85 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | GalaxyCore GC16B3C |
| Sensor size | 1/3.42 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | September, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | January, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 847 | 230 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 45 W |
Note
Vivo X200 Pro:
The black model is thinner (8.2) and lighter (223g).
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
