Vivo X200 vs Honor X6c

88 out 100
Vivo X200
VS
48 out 100
Honor X6c

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Honor X6c, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
  • Larger display: 6.67in
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Lighter design: 197g vs 199g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5300mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor X6c

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB
    - 16/512 GB
    - 16/1024 GB
    - 6/128 GB
    - 6/256 GB
    - 8/256 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Vivo X200 and Honor X6c
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    vs

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED TFT LCD
    Size 6.67 in 6.61 in
    Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 720x1604 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
    Pixel density 460 ppi 266 ppi
    Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
    Max brightness n/a 1010 nits
    HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
    Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
    Screen-to-body ratio 89.6 % 84.6 %
    Features - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming
    n/a
    Display test
    Peak brightness (auto)
    Vivo X200
    1554 nits
    Honor X6c
    n/a

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 160.3 mm (6.31 in) 165 mm (6.5 in)
    Width 74.8 mm (2.94 in) 75.6 mm (2.98 in)
    Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 8.4 mm (0.33 in)
    Weight 197 g (6.95 oz) 199 g (7.02 oz)
    Water resistance IP69 IP64
    Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
    Back panel Glass Plastic
    Frame Metal Plastic
    Colors - White
    - Black
    - Gray
    - Blue
    - White
    - Black
    - Green
    - Purple
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Vivo X200
    89.6 %
    Honor X6c
    84.6 %

    Performance

    Testing Vivo X200 and Honor X6c In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
    Max Frequency 3620 MHz 2000 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
    Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
    - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
    - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)
    - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
    - 2/2 (Cortex-A75)
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 3 nm 12 nm
    Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 Yes
    Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G52 MP2
    GPU Cores 1536 48
    GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 1000 MHz
    FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 96 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Vivo X200
    2693
    Honor X6c
    430
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Vivo X200
    8706
    Honor X6c
    1394
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2693430
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)87061394
    Geekbench Compute (GPU)23954n/a
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Vivo X200
    2553986
    Honor X6c
    254655
    CPU56170884372
    GPU118349034982
    Memory39930870145
    UX40948065156
    NanoReview Score2553986254655

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 12 GB
    - 16 GB
    6 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
    Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 1800 MHz
    Channels 4 2
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 256 GB
    - 512 GB
    - 1024 GB
    128 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1
    Memory CardNoMicroSD

    Software

    OS Android 15 Android 15
    UI Skin Funtouch OS 15 MagicOS 9

    Battery

    Volume 5800 mAh 5300 mAh
    Max Charging Power 90 W 35 W
    Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes No
    Fast Charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (30% in 20 min)
    Full Charge Time 0:39 h n/a
    Battery Life Test
    Battery Life
    Vivo X200
    22:51
    Honor X6c
    n/a
    Web Browsing10:06 hn/a
    Video Playback15:50 hn/a
    Games07:21 hn/a
    Standby Mode88 hn/a

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8160x6120 pixels
    Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
    Flash Dual LED LED
    Stabilization Optical Digital
    8K Recording No n/a
    4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) n/a
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
    Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) n/a
    Wide-angle lens 119 ° n/a
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Telephoto: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 50 MP
    Standard: 50 MP
    Depth
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.6f/1.8
    Focal length23 mmn/a
    SensorSony IMX921n/a
    Sensor size1/1.56n/a
    Pixel size1 μmn/a
    AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationOpticalDigital
    Telephoto
    Matrix50 MPn/a
    Aperturef/2.6n/a
    Focal length70 mmn/a
    SensorSony IMX882n/a
    Sensor size1/1.95n/a
    Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
    StabilizationOpticaln/a
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrix50 MPn/a
    Aperturef/2.0n/a
    Focal length15 mmn/a
    SensorSamsung JD1n/a
    Sensor size1/3.14n/a
    Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
    StabilizationDigitaln/a

    Front camera

    Matrix 32 MP 5 MP
    Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 2592x1944 pixels
    Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
    Focal length 20 mm n/a
    Sensor Samsung KD1 n/a
    Sensor size 1/3.44 n/a
    Autofocus n/a No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.4 5.1
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort Yes No
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    - NAVIC
    - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    NFC* Yes Yes
    Infrared Port Yes No
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    5G SupportYesNo

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo n/a
    3.5 mm Jack No Yes
    FM Radio No No
    Dolby Atmos n/a No

    Other

    Class Flagship Budget
    Announced October, 2024 yr June, 2025 yr
    Release Date October, 2024 yr June, 2025 yr
    Launch Price ($) 580 n/a
    MSRP ($) n/a 140
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 90 W n/a
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 0

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below