Vivo X200 vs Huawei Nova 12 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Huawei Nova 12 Pro, Manufactured in January, 2024 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9000S. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Lighter design: 197g vs 201g
- Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 4600mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Huawei Nova 12 Pro
- Larger display: 6.76in
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.76 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1224x2776 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 89 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.3 mm (6.31 in) | 163.14 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 74.8 mm (2.94 in) | 74.96 mm (2.95 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.68 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | n/a |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- White - Black - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | HiSilicon Kirin 9000S |
| Max Frequency | 3620 MHz | 2620 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/1.53 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.15 (TaiShan V120) - 1/2.62 (TaiShan V120) |
| Process | TSMC | SMIC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 750 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 0 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2693 | 1325 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8706 | 4118 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 23954 | n/a |
| CPU | 561708 | 279684 |
| GPU | 1183490 | 200980 |
| Memory | 399308 | 225502 |
| UX | 409480 | 194620 |
| NanoReview Score | 2553986 | 900786 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | HarmonyOS 4.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5800 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (78% in 30 min) | Yes (60% in 11 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:39 h | 0:24 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:06 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:50 h | n/a |
| Games | 07:21 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 88 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.4 - 4.0 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Omnivision OV50H |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.31 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.2 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 70 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung JD1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 60 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 8960x6720 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | Omnivision OV60A |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | December, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | January, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 580 | 580 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0