Vivo X200 vs Huawei P60 Pro

88 out 100
Vivo X200
VS
77 out 100
Huawei P60 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Huawei P60 Pro, Manufactured in March, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Lighter design: 197g vs 200g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 4815mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
Reasons to choose Huawei P60 Pro
  • Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 and Huawei P60 Pro
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
vs

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.67 in 6.67 in
Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1220x2700 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 444 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max brightness n/a 550 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 89.6 % 89.5 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200
1554 nits
Huawei P60 Pro
1128 nits
sRGB gamutn/a99.6 %
PWM (Flicker)n/a120 Hz
Response timen/a1 ms
Contrastn/a∞ Infinite

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.3 mm (6.31 in) 161 mm (6.34 in)
Width 74.8 mm (2.94 in) 74.5 mm (2.93 in)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 8.3 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 197 g (6.95 oz) 200 g (7.05 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP68
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Glass Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Blue
- White
- Black
- Green
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200
89.6 %
Huawei P60 Pro
89.5 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 and Huawei P60 Pro In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
Max Frequency 3620 MHz 3190 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)
- 4/2 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/2.75 (Cortex-A710)
- 1/3.2 (Cortex-X2)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 730
GPU Cores 1536 1024
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 875 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 1843.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200
2693
Huawei P60 Pro
1758
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200
8706
Huawei P60 Pro
4422
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)26931758
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)87064422
Geekbench Compute (GPU)23954n/a
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200
2553986
Huawei P60 Pro
1275824
CPU561708380609
GPU1183490472601
Memory399308202967
UX409480219647
NanoReview Score25539861275824
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200
n/a
Huawei P60 Pro
10551
Max Surface Temp.n/a50.3 °C
Stabilityn/a41 %
Graphics Testn/a63 fps
Graphics Scoren/a10551

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB
8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz n/a
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
- 256 GB
- 512 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoNano Memory

Software

OS Android 15 Android 13
UI Skin Funtouch OS 15 EMUI 13.1

Battery

Volume 5800 mAh 4815 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 88 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse Charging Yes Yes (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (58% in 15 min)
Full Charge Time 0:39 h 0:35 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200
22:51
Huawei P60 Pro
19:49
Web Browsing10:06 h08:26 h
Video Playback15:50 h12:20 h
Games07:21 h05:27 h
Standby Mode88 h88 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 48 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8000x6000 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Standard: 48 MP
Telephoto: 48 MP
Ultra-wide: 13 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP48 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.4
Focal length23 mm25 mm
SensorSony IMX921Sony IMX888
Sensor size1/1.561/1.4
Pixel size1 μm1.17 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MP48 MP
Aperturef/2.6f/2.1
Focal length70 mm90 mm
SensorSony IMX882Omnivision
Sensor size1/1.95n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP13 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length15 mm13 mm
SensorSamsung JD1n/a
Sensor size1/3.14n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitalDigital
Main camera DxOMark results
Photo quality
Vivo X200
n/a
Huawei P60 Pro
159
Video quality
Vivo X200
n/a
Huawei P60 Pro
147
Overall camera score
Vivo X200
n/a
Huawei P60 Pro
156
Bokehn/a80
Previewn/a75
Zoomn/a158

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 4160x3120 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
Focal length 20 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung KD1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.44 n/a
Pixel size n/a 1.22 μm
Autofocus n/a No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.1
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes DP 1.2
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 2/3/5/8
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66)
LTE categoryn/a20
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Vivo X200
n/a
Huawei P60 Pro
89.1 dB

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced October, 2024 yr March, 2023 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr March, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) 580 1199
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Hall Sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W Yes 88 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below