Home Phone comparison Vivo X200 and Infinix Note 30 - Which is better?

Vivo X200 vs Infinix Note 30

88 out 100
Vivo X200
VS
52 out 100
Infinix Note 30
Vivo X200
Infinix Note 30

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Infinix Note 30, Manufactured in May, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Lighter design: 197g vs 219g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 30
  • Larger display: 6.78in

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 and Infinix Note 30
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X200
vs
Infinix Note 30

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED LTPS LCD
Size 6.67 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2460 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 21:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 396 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) No
Max brightness n/a 580 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 89.6 % 83.1 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 DCI-P3
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200
1554 nits
Infinix Note 30
601 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.3 mm (6.31 in) 168.62 mm (6.64 in)
Width 74.8 mm (2.94 in) 76.6 mm (3.02 in)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 8.58 mm (0.34 in)
Weight 197 g (6.95 oz) 219 g (7.72 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP53
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Glass Plastic
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Blue		 - Black
- Gold
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200
89.6 %
Infinix Note 30
83.1 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 and Infinix Note 30 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 MediaTek Helio G99
Max Frequency 3620 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)		 - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 Yes
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU Cores 1536 128
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 128 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200
2693
Infinix Note 30
737
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200
8706
Infinix Note 30
1946
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2693737
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)87061946
Geekbench Compute (GPU)23954n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200], [Infinix Note 30]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200
2553986
Infinix Note 30
425048
CPU561708132477
GPU118349065923
Memory399308108428
UX409480118220
NanoReview Score2553986425048
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200
n/a
Infinix Note 30
1251
Stabilityn/a99 %
Graphics Testn/a7 fps
Graphics Scoren/a1251
Sources: 3DMark [Infinix Note 30]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200
n/a
Infinix Note 30
10821
Writing scoren/a12794
Web scoren/a10016
Video editingn/a6429
Data manipulationn/a7419
NanoReview Scoren/a10821

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB		 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		- 128 GB
- 256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14)
UI Skin Funtouch OS 15 XOS 14

Battery

Volume 5800 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 45 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (64% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:39 h 0:57 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200
22:51
Infinix Note 30
21:54
Web Browsing10:06 h07:15 h
Video Playback15:50 h11:47 h
Games07:21 h05:01 h
Standby Mode88 h126 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 64 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 9216x6912 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash Dual LED Quad LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 120 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 64 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Depth
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP64 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.7
Focal length23 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX921Omnivision OV64B
Sensor size1/1.561/2
Pixel size1 μm0.8 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.6n/a
Focal length70 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX882n/a
Sensor size1/1.95n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.0n/a
Focal length15 mmn/a
SensorSamsung JD1n/a
Sensor size1/3.14n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 16 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 4608x3456 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung KD1 Hynix HI-1631Q
Sensor size 1/3.44 1/3
Pixel size n/a 0.8 μm
Autofocus n/a No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Varies by region
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 2|3|5|8
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA B1|5|8
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1358384041)
LTE categoryn/a13
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos n/a No

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced October, 2024 yr May, 2023 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr May, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) 580 230
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W Yes 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below