Home Phone comparison Vivo X200 and Oppo Realme C55 - Which is better?

Vivo X200 vs Oppo Realme C55

88 out 100
Vivo X200
VS
48 out 100
Oppo Realme C55
Vivo X200
Oppo Realme C55

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Oppo Realme C55, Manufactured in March, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme C55
  • Larger display: 6.72in
  • Lighter design: 189.5g vs 197g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/64 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 and Oppo Realme C55
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X200
vs
Oppo Realme C55

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 6.67 in 6.72 in
Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 392 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) No
Max brightness n/a 680 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 180 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 89.6 % 86.7 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 n/a
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200
1554 nits
Oppo Realme C55
655 nits
sRGB gamutn/a100 %
Response timen/a21 ms
Contrastn/a1471:1
Sources: NotebookCheck [Oppo Realme C55]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.3 mm (6.31 in) 165.6 mm (6.52 in)
Width 74.8 mm (2.94 in) 75.9 mm (2.99 in)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 7.89 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 197 g (6.95 oz) 189.5 g (6.68 oz)
Water resistance IP69 No
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Glass Plastic
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Blue		 - Blue
- Green
- Yellow
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200
89.6 %
Oppo Realme C55
86.7 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 and Oppo Realme C55 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 MediaTek Helio G88
Max Frequency 3620 MHz 2000 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)		 - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2 (Cortex-A75)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek APU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Cores 1536 48
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 96 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200
2693
Oppo Realme C55
425
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200
8706
Oppo Realme C55
1413
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2693425
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)87061413
Geekbench Compute (GPU)23954n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200
2553986
Oppo Realme C55
274070
CPU56170881734
GPU118349041920
Memory39930874959
UX40948075457
NanoReview Score2553986274070
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200
n/a
Oppo Realme C55
742
Max Surface Temp.n/a47.8 °C
Stabilityn/a98 %
Graphics Testn/a4 fps
Graphics Scoren/a742
Sources: 3DMark [Oppo Realme C55]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200
n/a
Oppo Realme C55
8633
Writing scoren/a9636
Web scoren/a7137
Video editingn/a6212
Data manipulationn/a6028
NanoReview Scoren/a8633

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB		 - 6 GB
- 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 1800 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		- 128 GB
- 256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14)
OS Size n/a 20 GB
UI Skin Funtouch OS 15 Realme UI 5.0

Battery

Volume 5800 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 33 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (27% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:39 h 1:09 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200
22:51
Oppo Realme C55
22:19
Web Browsing10:06 h07:44 h
Video Playback15:50 h12:22 h
Games07:21 h05:14 h
Standby Mode88 h124 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 64 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 9248x6944 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 120 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 64 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP64 MP
Aperturef/1.6n/a
Focal length23 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX921Omnivision OV64B
Sensor size1/1.561/2
Pixel size1 μm0.7 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.6n/a
Focal length70 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX882n/a
Sensor size1/1.95n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.0n/a
Focal length15 mmn/a
SensorSamsung JD1n/a
Sensor size1/3.14n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung KD1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.44 n/a
Autofocus n/a No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
DisplayPort Yes n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Varies by region
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA Bands 1/5/8
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41)
LTE categoryn/a7
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Vivo X200
n/a
Oppo Realme C55
80.6 dB

Other

Class Flagship Budget
Announced October, 2024 yr March, 2023 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr March, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) 580 160
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W Yes 33 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below