Vivo X200 vs Oppo Realme GT Neo 3

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Oppo Realme GT Neo 3, Manufactured in March, 2022 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
  • Larger display: 6.7in
  • Lighter design: 188g vs 197g
  • Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 and Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 in 6.7 in
Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2412 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 394 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max brightness n/a 600 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 1000 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 89.6 % 87.7 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200
1554 nits
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
789 nits
sRGB gamutn/a100 %
PWM (Flicker)n/a359 Hz
Response timen/a11 ms
Contrastn/a∞ Infinite

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.3 mm (6.31 in) 163.3 mm (6.43 in)
Width 74.8 mm (2.94 in) 75.6 mm (2.98 in)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 8.2 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 197 g (6.95 oz) 188 g (6.63 oz)
Water resistance IP69 No
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel Glass Glass
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Blue
- Black
- Silver
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200
89.6 %
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
87.7 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 and Oppo Realme GT Neo 3 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Max Frequency 3620 MHz 2850 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.85 (Cortex-A78)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 5 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek APU 580
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Cores 1536 768
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 860 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 1309 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200
2693
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
1096
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200
8706
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
3393
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)26931096
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)87063393
Geekbench Compute (GPU)23954n/a
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200
2553986
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
878115
CPU561708249904
GPU1183490215630
Memory399308183608
UX409480228973
NanoReview Score2553986878115
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200
n/a
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
5650
Max Surface Temp.n/a48.5 °C
Stabilityn/a95 %
Graphics Testn/a33 fps
Graphics Scoren/a5650
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200
n/a
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
14531
Writing scoren/a20973
Web scoren/a11338
Video editingn/a6664
Data manipulationn/a9389
NanoReview Scoren/a14531

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB
- 6 GB
- 8 GB
- 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz n/a
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
- 128 GB
- 256 GB
- 512 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13)
UI Skin Funtouch OS 15 Realme UI 3.0

Battery

Volume 5800 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 80 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 12 min)
Full Charge Time 0:39 h 0:33 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200
22:51
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
22:01
Web Browsing10:06 h08:56 h
Video Playback15:50 h13:29 h
Games07:21 h05:25 h
Standby Mode88 h104 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 480 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° 120 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Macro: 2 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Focal length23 mm24 mm
SensorSony IMX921Sony IMX766
Sensor size1/1.561/1.56
Pixel size1 μm1 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.6n/a
Focal length70 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX882n/a
Sensor size1/1.95n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.3
Focal length15 mm15 mm
SensorSamsung JD1Sony IMX355
Sensor size1/3.141/4.0
Pixel size0.7 μm1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 16 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 4608x3456 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 20 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 Samsung S5K3P9
Sensor size 1/3.44 1/3.09
Pixel size n/a 1 μm
Autofocus n/a No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)
LTE categoryn/a20
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Vivo X200
n/a
Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
82.5 dB

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced October, 2024 yr March, 2022 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr March, 2022 yr
Launch Price ($) 580 410
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W Yes 80 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below