Vivo X200 vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, Manufactured in September, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
  • Larger display: 6.67in
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
  • Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB
- 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/64 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED PLS TFT
Size 6.67 in 6.6 in
Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2408 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 400 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) No
Max brightness n/a 450 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 89.6 % 82.7 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
DCI-P3
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200
1554 nits
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
507 nits
sRGB gamutn/a99.9 %
Response timen/a22 ms
Contrastn/a1442:1

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.3 mm (6.31 in) 165.4 mm (6.51 in)
Width 74.8 mm (2.94 in) 76.9 mm (3.03 in)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 8.4 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 197 g (6.95 oz) 197 g (6.95 oz)
Water resistance IP69 No
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Glass Plastic
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Blue
- White
- Black
- Blue
- Yellow
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200
89.6 %
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
82.7 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Max Frequency 3620 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55))
- 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon 686
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 619
GPU Cores 1536 256
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 430.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200
2693
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
895
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200
8706
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
1943
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2693895
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)87061943
Geekbench Compute (GPU)23954n/a
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200
2553986
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
417389
CPU561708152613
GPU118349080451
Memory39930879577
UX409480104748
NanoReview Score2553986417389
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200
n/a
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
1197
Max Surface Temp.n/a43.9 °C
Stabilityn/a99 %
Graphics Testn/a7 fps
Graphics Scoren/a1197
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200
n/a
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
10034
Writing scoren/a12734
Web scoren/a9116
Video editingn/a4801
Data manipulationn/a8549
NanoReview Scoren/a10034

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB
- 4 GB
- 6 GB
- 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
- 64 GB
- 128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14)
UI Skin Funtouch OS 15 One UI 6

Battery

Volume 5800 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 25 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (58% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:39 h 1:08 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200
22:51
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
26:19
Web Browsing10:06 h10:23 h
Video Playback15:50 h15:03 h
Games07:21 h05:45 h
Standby Mode88 h134 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 120 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° 123 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 5 MP
Macro: 2 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Focal length23 mm26 mm
SensorSony IMX921Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size1/1.561/2.76
Pixel size1 μm0.64 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.6n/a
Focal length70 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX882n/a
Sensor size1/1.95n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP5 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length15 mm13 mm
SensorSamsung JD1GalaxyCore 5035
Sensor size1/3.141/5
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 20 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 GalaxyCore
Sensor size 1/3.44 1/4.0
Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
Autofocus n/a No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 1900 MHz
3G Bandsn/aUMTS Band I (2100), Band II (1900), Band IV (1700/2100), Band V (850), Band VIII (900)
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B12/B13/B20/B25/B26/B38/B39/B40/B41/B46/B48/B66/B71)
LTE categoryn/a18
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Vivo X200
n/a
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
85.9 dB

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced October, 2024 yr August, 2022 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr September, 2022 yr
Launch Price ($) 580 300
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Barometer
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below