Vivo X200 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
88
out 100
VS
69
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2021 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200
- Lighter design: 197g vs 234g
- Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.81in
- Higher pixel density: 515ppi
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.81 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1440x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 515 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | n/a | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 91.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 510 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 2.8 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.3 mm (6.31 in) | 164.3 mm (6.47 in) |
| Width | 74.8 mm (2.94 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Ceramic |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- White - Black |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 |
| Max Frequency | 3620 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 660 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 1290.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2693 | 1463 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8706 | 3911 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 23954 | n/a |
| CPU | 561708 | 246800 |
| GPU | 1183490 | 260294 |
| Memory | 399308 | 182528 |
| UX | 409480 | 233954 |
| NanoReview Score | 2553986 | 923576 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 43.1 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 91 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 31 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 5285 |
| Writing score | n/a | 14672 |
| Web score | n/a | 11015 |
| Video editing | n/a | 7568 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 9531 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 12250 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | n/a | 31 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (67 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (78% in 30 min) | Yes (90% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:39 h | 0:37 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:06 h | 06:28 h |
| Video Playback | 15:50 h | 11:22 h |
| Games | 07:21 h | 04:38 h |
| Standby Mode | 88 h | 90 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8700x5800 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 1920 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 128 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Samsung GN2 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.12 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/4.1 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 120 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung JD1 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 75 |
| Preview | n/a | 72 |
| Zoom | n/a | 142 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 5380x3620 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.3 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | Samsung S5K3T2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM850 900 1800 MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMAB1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8 / B19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | April, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 580 | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
