Vivo X300 FE vs Oppo Reno 16

92 out 100

VS

82 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X300 FE Manufactured in March, 2026, with display 6.31 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, vs Oppo Reno 16, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Vivo X300 FE

Higher pixel density: 461ppi
Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
Supports DisplayPort
Supports Dolby Atmos
Built-in eSIM

Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 16

Larger display: 6.32in
Lighter design: 188g vs 190g
Higher battery capacity: 6700mAh vs 6500mAh

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 16/1024 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB

- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X300 FE and Oppo Reno 16

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Vivo X300 FE

94

Oppo Reno 16

94

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Vivo X300 FE

87

Oppo Reno 16

85

Performance

App & system performance

Vivo X300 FE

97

Oppo Reno 16

72

Games

3D gaming performance

Vivo X300 FE

95

Oppo Reno 16

62

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Vivo X300 FE

97

Oppo Reno 16

88

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Vivo X300 FE

93

Oppo Reno 16

73

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Vivo X300 FE

92

Oppo Reno 16

82

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	AMOLED	AMOLED
Size	6.31 in	6.32 in
Resolution	1260x2800 pixels	1216x2640 pixels
Aspect ratio	19.5:9	19.5:9
Pixel density	461 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	Yes (1-120 Hz)	Yes
Max brightness	1800 nits	1800 nits
HDR support	Yes, HDR10+	Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate	300 Hz	240 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio	90.3 %	89.6 %
Features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming	- DCI-P3 - DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	150.83 mm (5.94 in)	151.21 mm (5.95 in)
Width	71.76 mm (2.83 in)	72.42 mm (2.85 in)
Thickness	7.99 mm (0.31 in)	8.2 mm (0.32 in)
Weight	190 g (6.7 oz)	188 g (6.63 oz)
Water resistance	IP69	IP69
Cooling system	Vapor chamber	Vapor chamber
Back panel	Glass	n/a
Frame	Metal	Metal
Colors	- White - Black - Purple	- White - Black - Purple
Fingerprint sensor	Yes, In-Display	Yes, In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Vivo X300 FE

90.3 %

Oppo Reno 16

89.6 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X300 FE and Oppo Reno 16 In benchmarks

Chipset	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5	MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super
Max Frequency	2800 MHz	3400 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (2 + 6)	8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture	6/3.32 ()	- 4/2.2 (Cortex-A725) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A725) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-A725)
Process	TSMC	TSMC
Transistor Size	3 nm	4 nm
Neural Processor	Hexagon	MediaTek NPU 880
Graphics	Adreno 829	n/a
GPU Cores	1024	n/a
GPU Frequency	1200 MHz	n/a
FLOPS	2457.6 GFLOPS	n/a

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Vivo X300 FE

2818

Oppo Reno 16

1611

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Vivo X300 FE

9052

Oppo Reno 16

6402

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	2818	1611
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	9052	6402
Geekbench Compute (GPU)	16659	n/a

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X300 FE], [Oppo Reno 16]

AnTuTu 10

Vivo X300 FE

2869139

Oppo Reno 16

2078850

CPU	861821	646700
GPU	1005345	646793
Memory	381541	276204
UX	620432	509153
NanoReview Score	2869139	2078850

Memory

RAM Size	16 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Channels	4	4

Storage Capacity	1024 GB	256 GB
Storage Type	UFS 4.1	UFS 3.1
Memory Card	No	No

Software

OS	Android 16	Android 16
UI Skin	OriginOS 6	ColorOS 16

Battery

Volume	6500 mAh	6700 mAh
Max Charging Power	90 W	80 W
Battery Type	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	Yes (40 W)	No
Reverse Charging	Yes	Yes
Fast Charging	Yes (48% in 30 min)	Yes
Full Charge Time	0:58 h	n/a

Main camera

Matrix	50 MP	200 MP
Photo resolution	8192x6144 pixels	16320x12240 pixels
Zoom	Optical, 3x	Optical, 3.5x
Flash	LED	Dual LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K Recording	No	No
4K Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion	960 fps (1080p)	240 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens	110 °	116 °
Lenses count	Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP	Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode

Matrix	50 MP	200 MP
Aperture	f/1.6	f/1.8
Focal length	n/a	24 mm
Sensor size	1/1.56 (0.64)	n/a
Autofocus	Phase autofocus	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Optical	Optical

Matrix	50 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/2.6	f/2.8
Focal length	70 mm	80 mm
Sensor	Sony IMX882	n/a
Sensor size	1/1.95 (0.51)	n/a
Pixel size	0.8 μm	n/a
Stabilization	Optical	Optical

Matrix	8 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.0
Focal length	15 mm	16 mm
Sensor size	1/4.0 (0.25)	n/a
Pixel size	1.12 μm	n/a
Stabilization	Digital	Digital

Front camera

Matrix	50 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	8192x6144 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Aperture	f/2.0	f/2.0
Focal length	n/a	18 mm
Sensor size	1/2.76 (0.36)	n/a
Autofocus	Phase autofocus	No
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	2160p (4K) at 60 fps	2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	6.0	5.4
Bluetooth features	LE	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	Yes	No
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC
NFC*	Yes	Yes
Infrared Port	Yes	Yes

SIM Count*	2	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	Dual SIM Standby	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	Yes	No
Hybrid Slot	No	No
2G Bands	GSM 850/900/1800/1900	GSM 850/900/1800MHz
3G Bands	WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19	WCDMA 1/4/5/8/19
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71)	LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66)
5G Support	Yes	Yes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack	No	No
FM Radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	No

Other

Class	Flagship	Mid-range
Announced	March, 2026 yr	May, 2026 yr
Release Date	March, 2026 yr	May, 2026 yr
MSRP ($)	n/a	515
Sensors	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	Yes, 90 W	Yes, 80 W

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 FE the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Vivo X300 FE

1 (100%)

Oppo Reno 16

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 1

Vivo X300 FE vs Oppo Reno 16

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments