Home Phone comparison Vivo X300 Ultra and Google Pixel 11 Pro XL - Which is better?

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL

94 out 100
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
83 out 100
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Vivo X300 Ultra
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X300 Ultra Manufactured in April, 2026, with display 6.82 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL, Manufactured in August, 2026 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G6. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Larger display: 6.82in
  • Higher pixel density: 510ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5115mAh
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
  • Lighter design: 226g vs 232g
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X300 Ultra and Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X300 Ultra
vs
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.82 in 6.8 in
Resolution 1440x3168 pixels 1344x2992 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 20:9
Pixel density 510 ppi 482 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 1800 nits 3600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3 % 89.7 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.98 mm (6.42 in) 162.7 mm (6.41 in)
Width 76.81 mm (3.02 in) 76.5 mm (3.01 in)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 in) 8.5 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 232 g (8.18 oz) 226 g (7.97 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP68
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel Glass Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Black
- Silver
- Green		 - Black
- Blue
- Green
- Orange
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Display Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X300 Ultra
90.3 %
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
89.7 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X300 Ultra and Google Pixel 11 Pro XL In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Google Tensor G6
Max Frequency 4600 MHz 4110 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 7 (1 + 4 + 2)
Architecture - 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance)
- 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime)		 - 2/2.65 ()
- 4/3.38 ()
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon Yes
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X300 Ultra
3621
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
2677
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X300 Ultra
10653
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
7321
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)36212677
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)106537321
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X300 Ultra], [Google Pixel 11 Pro XL]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X300 Ultra
4247433
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
1933536
CPU1192014876037
GPU1543938288736
Memory525105304202
UX986376464561
NanoReview Score42474331933536

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 5333 MHz n/a
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 16 Android 17
UI Skin OriginOS 6 Stock Android

Battery

Volume 6600 mAh 5115 mAh
Max Charging Power 100 W 45 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (40 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse Charging Yes Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes Yes (75% in 30 min)

Main camera

Matrix 200 MP 50 MP
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) 240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 116 ° 123 °
Lenses count Standard: 200 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 48 MP
Ultra-wide: 48 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix200 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Focal length35 mm25 mm
SensorSony LYT-901n/a
Sensor size1/1.12 (0.89)1/1.3 (0.77)
Pixel size0.7 μm1.2 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix200 MP48 MP
Aperturef/2.7f/2.8
Focal length85 mm106 mm
SensorSamsung ISOCELL HPBn/a
Sensor size1/1.4 (0.71)1/1.95 (0.51)
Pixel size0.56 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP48 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/1.7
Focal length14 mmn/a
SensorSony LYT-818n/a
Sensor size1/1.28 (0.78)1/2.51 (0.4)
Pixel size1.22 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 42 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 3648x2736 pixels
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.2
Focal length 24 mm 17 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL JN1 Sony IMX858
Sensor size 1/2.76 (0.36) 1/2.51 (0.4)
Pixel size 0.64 μm 0.7 μm
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*21
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced March, 2026 yr August, 2026 yr
Release Date April, 2026 yr August, 2026 yr
MSRP ($) 1199 1299
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes, 80 W No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below