Vivo X90 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
77
out 100
VS
60
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X90 Pro Manufactured in December, 2022, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9200, vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT, Manufactured in June, 2022 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X90 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 453ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 200g vs 214.85g
- Higher battery capacity: 5080mAh vs 4870mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.6 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1080x2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-144 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 270 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8 % | 86.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 99.9 % | 97.9 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 60 Hz | 51540 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 24 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 1573:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.07 mm (6.46 in) | 163.64 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 74.53 mm (2.93 in) | 74.29 mm (2.92 in) |
| Thickness | 9.34 mm (0.37 in) | 8.87 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 214.85 g (7.58 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Red |
- Black - Silver - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 |
| Max Frequency | 3050 MHz | 2850 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.05 (Cortex-X3) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.85 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 690 | MediaTek APU 580 |
| Graphics | Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 | Mali-G610 MP6 |
| GPU Cores | 2112 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 860 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3590.4 GFLOPS | 1309 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2058 | 1072 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5465 | 3360 |
| CPU | 375722 | 244579 |
| GPU | 537522 | 203775 |
| Memory | 294299 | 177719 |
| UX | 299574 | 202438 |
| NanoReview Score | 1507117 | 828511 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 31 °C | 38.8 °C |
| Stability | 94 % | 62 % |
| Graphics Test | 73 fps | 35 fps |
| Graphics Score | 12376 | 5845 |
| Writing score | n/a | 17960 |
| Web score | n/a | 11243 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6914 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 10319 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 12424 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 35 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 13 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 4870 mAh | 5080 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 9 min) | Yes (50% in 20 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:24 h | 0:57 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:13 h | 09:53 h |
| Video Playback | 12:57 h | 14:28 h |
| Games | 05:37 h | 05:53 h |
| Standby Mode | 87 h | 119 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 503 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 9248x6936 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 108 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50.3 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 503 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Samsung Bright S5KGW1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1 | 1/1.72 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 50 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX758 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX663 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.93 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 71 | n/a |
| Zoom | 141 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.45 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD1 | Sony IMX596 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2022 yr | June, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2022 yr | June, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 800 | 379 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X90 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
