Vivo Y18 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
47
out 100
VS
58
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Y18 Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 6.56 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Tecno Camon 30 5G, Manufactured in March, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo Y18
- Lighter design: 185g vs 199g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 30 5G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.56 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 1080x2436 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 840 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84 % | 88.4 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.63 mm (6.44 in) | 165.4 mm (6.51 in) |
| Width | 75.58 mm (2.98 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.39 mm (0.33 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | n/a |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Blue - Brown |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 144 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 259.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 419 | 890 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1461 | 2311 |
| CPU | 87116 | 146448 |
| GPU | 39972 | 48945 |
| Memory | 68387 | 133995 |
| UX | 75124 | 133055 |
| NanoReview Score | 270599 | 462443 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| OS Size | 23 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 14 | HIOS 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 70 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (20% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 18 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:40 h | 0:44 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP Depth: 50 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.57 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B13/B18/B19/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | February, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | March, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 110 | 340 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 15 W | Yes 70 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 30 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
