Vivo Y200 4G vs Infinix Smart 8 Pro
55
out 100
VS
45
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Y200 4G Manufactured in February, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Infinix Smart 8 Pro, Manufactured in February, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G36. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo Y200 4G
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 188g vs 189g
Reasons to choose Infinix Smart 8 Pro
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/256 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.6 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 720x1612 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 267 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7 % | 85.1 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.2 mm (6.43 in) | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Silver - Green |
- White - Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Helio G36 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 319.2 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 480 | 240 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1524 | 848 |
| CPU | 114772 | 50494 |
| GPU | 42991 | 13003 |
| Memory | 108864 | 44645 |
| UX | 85232 | 32799 |
| NanoReview Score | 351859 | 140941 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 14 | Android Go |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (80% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 3:15 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800 MHz | GSM B2|3|5|8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2025 yr | January, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2025 yr | February, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 210 | 120 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Y200 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
