Vivo Y200 4G vs Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Y200 4G Manufactured in February, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo Y200 4G
- Lighter design: 188g vs 198g
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G
- Higher pixel density: 446ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6720mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1220x2712 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 1500 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7 % | 89.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.2 mm (6.43 in) | 161.21 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) | 74.74 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.65 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Eco Leather |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Silver - Green |
- Black - Gold - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | 319.2 GFLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 480 | 1055 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1524 | 3029 |
| CPU | 114772 | 200303 |
| GPU | 42991 | 144126 |
| Memory | 108864 | 127847 |
| UX | 85232 | 171167 |
| NanoReview Score | 351859 | 643443 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 14 | Hello UI |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6720 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 30 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (80% in 30 min) | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 12 mm |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3280x2460 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800 MHz | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2025 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 210 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 329 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0