Home Phone comparison Vivo Y200 Pro and Oppo Find X7 - Which is better?

Vivo Y200 Pro vs Oppo Find X7

56 out 100
Vivo Y200 Pro
VS
83 out 100
Oppo Find X7
Vivo Y200 Pro
Oppo Find X7

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Y200 Pro Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Oppo Find X7, Manufactured in January, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo Y200 Pro
  • Lighter design: 183g vs 206g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X7
  • Higher pixel density: 450ppi
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo Y200 Pro and Oppo Find X7
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo Y200 Pro
vs
Oppo Find X7

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1080x2400 pixels 1264x2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 388 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate n/a Yes
Max brightness 1300 nits 4500 nits
HDR support No Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 240 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1 % 90.5 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 164.44 mm (6.47 in) 162.7 mm (6.41 in)
Width 74.92 mm (2.95 in) 75.4 mm (2.97 in)
Thickness 7.49 mm (0.29 in) 8.7 mm (0.34 in)
Weight 183 g (6.46 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Water resistance IP54 IP65
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic Glass
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - Black
- Green		 - Black
- Blue
- Purple
- Brown
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo Y200 Pro
90.1 %
Oppo Find X7
90.5 %

Performance

Testing Vivo Y200 Pro and Oppo Find X7 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 MediaTek Dimensity 9300
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55))
- 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78))		 - 4/2 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 790
Graphics Adreno 619 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores 256 1536
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS 430.1 GFLOPS 3993.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo Y200 Pro
910
Oppo Find X7
2225
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo Y200 Pro
2201
Oppo Find X7
7438
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)9102225
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)22017438
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Find X7]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo Y200 Pro
438348
Oppo Find X7
1999540
CPU159023488894
GPU80671809566
Memory95672349022
UX102982352058
NanoReview Score4383481999540
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo Y200 Pro
n/a
Oppo Find X7
11076
Sources: 3DMark [Oppo Find X7]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Vivo Y200 Pro
n/a
Oppo Find X7
12670
Writing scoren/a17595
Web scoren/a9404
Video editingn/a5474
Data manipulationn/a12671
NanoReview Scoren/a12670

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB - 12 GB
- 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 4266 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 14 Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15)
UI Skin Funtouch 14 ColorOS 15

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 44 W 100 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes n/a
Fast Charging Yes Yes (50% in 10 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 0:27 h

Main camera

Matrix 64 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution n/a 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 480 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens n/a 119 °
Lenses count Standard: 64 MP
Depth: 2 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 64 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix64 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Focal lengthn/a23 mm
Sensorn/aSony LYT-T808
Sensor sizen/a1/1.43
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrixn/a64 MP
Aperturen/af/2.6
Focal lengthn/a70 mm
Sensorn/aOmnivision OV64B
Sensor sizen/a1/2.0
Pixel sizen/a0.7 μm
Stabilizationn/aOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a50 MP
Aperturen/af/2.0
Focal lengthn/a15 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung S5KJN1
Sensor sizen/a1/2.76
Pixel sizen/a0.64 μm
Stabilizationn/aDigital

Front camera

Matrix 16 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution n/a 6560x4928 pixels
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.4
Focal length n/a 21 mm
Sensor CMOS Sony IMX709
Sensor size n/a 1/2.74
Pixel size n/a 0.8 μm
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.1 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bands850/900/1800/1900 MHzGSM 850/900/1800MHz
3G BandsWCDMA B1/B5/B8WCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28)LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B66)
LTE category18n/a
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Mono Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Flagship
Announced June, 2024 yr January, 2024 yr
Release Date June, 2024 yr January, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 300 565
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 44 W Yes 100 W

Note

Vivo Y200 Pro:

The smartphone is 11 grams lighter in black color.

Oppo Find X7:

The rear cover can be either glass or eco-leather, with a weight difference of 4 grams.

* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X7 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below