Vivo Y200 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G
56
out 100
VS
72
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Y200 Pro Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo Y200 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 388ppi
- Lighter design: 183g vs 183.5g
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G
- Higher battery capacity: 5700mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/128 GB | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1 % | 88.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.44 mm (6.47 in) | 163.29 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 74.92 mm (2.95 in) | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 7.49 mm (0.29 in) | 7.39 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 183.5 g (6.47 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Green |
- White - Silver |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 619 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 910 | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2201 | n/a |
| CPU | 159023 | n/a |
| GPU | 80671 | n/a |
| Memory | 95672 | n/a |
| UX | 102982 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 438348 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 14 | FuntouchOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 44 W | 44 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.45 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | GSM 850/900/1800Mhz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 | LTE B1/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 300 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 210 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 44 W | Yes, 44 W |
Note
Vivo Y200 Pro:
The smartphone is 11 grams lighter in black color.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
