Home Phone comparison Vivo Y200 Pro and Vivo Y300 GT - Which is better?

Vivo Y200 Pro vs Vivo Y300 GT

56 out 100
Vivo Y200 Pro
VS
79 out 100
Vivo Y300 GT
Vivo Y200 Pro
Vivo Y300 GT

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Y200 Pro Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Vivo Y300 GT, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo Y200 Pro
  • Lighter design: 183g vs 212g
Reasons to choose Vivo Y300 GT
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 7620mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo Y200 Pro and Vivo Y300 GT
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo Y200 Pro
vs
Vivo Y300 GT

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1080x2400 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 388 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate n/a Yes
Max brightness 1300 nits n/a
HDR support No Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1 % 89.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 164.44 mm (6.47 in) 163.72 mm (6.45 in)
Width 74.92 mm (2.95 in) 75.88 mm (2.99 in)
Thickness 7.49 mm (0.29 in) 8.09 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 183 g (6.46 oz) 212 g (7.48 oz)
Water resistance IP54 IP65
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic n/a
Frame Plastic Plastic
Colors - Black
- Green		 - Black
- Gold
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo Y200 Pro
90.1 %
Vivo Y300 GT
89.3 %

Performance

Testing Vivo Y200 Pro and Vivo Y300 GT In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55))
- 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78))		 - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon 686 MediaTek NPU 880
Graphics Adreno 619 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU Cores 256 896
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS 430.1 GFLOPS 2329.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo Y200 Pro
910
Vivo Y300 GT
1647
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo Y200 Pro
2201
Vivo Y300 GT
6419
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)9101647
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)22016419
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a11498
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo Y300 GT]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo Y200 Pro
438348
Vivo Y300 GT
1772278
CPU159023418341
GPU80671675608
Memory95672345030
UX102982333299
NanoReview Score4383481772278

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz n/a
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
UI Skin Funtouch 14 OriginOS 5

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 7620 mAh
Max Charging Power 44 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes (50% in 23 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 0:57 h

Main camera

Matrix 64 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution n/a 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 64 MP
Depth: 2 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix64 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Sensorn/aSony LYT-600
Sensor sizen/a1/1.95
Pixel sizen/a0.7 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical

Front camera

Matrix 16 MP 16 MP
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.5
Sensor CMOS Sony IMX480
Sensor size n/a 1/3.09
Pixel size n/a 1 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.1 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bands850/900/1800/1900 MHzGSM 850/900/1800MHz
3G BandsWCDMA B1/B5/B8WCDMA B1/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28)LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48)
LTE category18n/a
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Mono n/a
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced June, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Release Date June, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 300 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 280
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 44 W Yes 90 W

Note

Vivo Y200 Pro:

The smartphone is 11 grams lighter in black color.

* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo Y300 GT the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below