Home Phone comparison Vivo Y36 and Honor X9d - Which is better?

Vivo Y36 vs Honor X9d

50 out 100
Vivo Y36
VS
74 out 100
Honor X9d
Vivo Y36
Honor X9d

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo Y36 Manufactured in May, 2023, with display 6.64 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680, vs Honor X9d, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo Y36
    Reasons to choose Honor X9d
    • Larger display: 6.79in
    • Higher pixel density: 427ppi
    • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
    • Lighter design: 193g vs 202g
    • Higher battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 5000mAh
    • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
    • Infrared port

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 4/128 GB
    - 8/128 GB
    - 8/256 GB    		 - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Vivo Y36 and Honor X9d
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    Vivo Y36
    vs
    Honor X9d

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type IPS LCD AMOLED
    Size 6.64 in 6.79 in
    Resolution 1080x2388 pixels 1200x2640 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 19.85:9
    Pixel density 395 ppi 427 ppi
    Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
    Max brightness 650 nits 1800 nits
    HDR support No Yes, HDR10
    Screen-to-body ratio 85.2 % 90.8 %
    Features DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 164.06 mm (6.46 in) 161.9 mm (6.37 in)
    Width 76.17 mm (3 in) 76.1 mm (3 in)
    Thickness 8.07 mm (0.32 in) 7.9 mm (0.31 in)
    Weight 202 g (7.13 oz) 193 g (6.81 oz)
    Water resistance IP54 IP69
    Back panel Plastic Plastic
    Frame Plastic Plastic
    Colors - Black
    - Gold
    - Blue    		 - Black
    - Gold
    - Green
    - Brown
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes, In-Display
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Vivo Y36
    85.2 %
    Honor X9d
    90.8 %

    Performance

    Testing Vivo Y36 and Honor X9d In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
    Max Frequency 2400 MHz 2300 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
    Architecture - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53))
    - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73))    		 - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520))
    - 3/2.2 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720))
    - 1/2.3 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720))
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
    Neural Processor Hexagon 686 Hexagon
    Graphics Adreno 610 Adreno 810
    GPU Cores 128 256
    GPU Frequency 1114 MHz 895 MHz
    FLOPS 284 GFLOPS 458.2 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Vivo Y36
    413
    Honor X9d
    1086
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Vivo Y36
    1465
    Honor X9d
    3103
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)4131086
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)14653103
    Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo Y36]
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Vivo Y36
    339060
    Honor X9d
    977304
    CPU100167358049
    GPU40138160718
    Memory118556210830
    UX80139247707
    NanoReview Score339060977304
    3DMark Wild Life
    3DMark Wild Life
    Vivo Y36
    588
    Honor X9d
    n/a
    Sources: 3DMark [Vivo Y36]
    PCMark 3.0
    PCMark 3.0
    Vivo Y36
    6869
    Honor X9d
    n/a
    Writing score8623n/a
    Web score6967n/a
    Video editing3920n/a
    Data manipulation5732n/a
    NanoReview Score6869n/a

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 4 GB
    - 8 GB    		 12 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
    Memory Frequency 2133 MHz n/a
    Channels 2 2
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 128 GB
    - 256 GB    		256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
    Memory CardMicroSDNo

    Software

    OS Android 13 Android 15
    UI Skin Funtouch 13 MagicOS 9.0

    Battery

    Volume 5000 mAh 8300 mAh
    Max Charging Power 44 W 66 W
    Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes Yes
    Fast Charging Yes (30% in 15 min) Yes
    Full Charge Time 0:55 h n/a

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 108 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 12000x9000 pixels
    Zoom Digital Digital
    Flash LED LED
    Stabilization Digital Optical
    8K Recording No No
    4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Macro: 2 MP
    Depth: 2 MP    		 Standard: 108 MP
    Ultra-wide: 5 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode    		 - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP108 MP
    Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
    Sensor sizen/a1/1.67
    Pixel sizen/a1 μm
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationDigitalOptical
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrixn/a5 MP
    Aperturen/af/2.2
    Stabilizationn/aDigital

    Front camera

    Matrix 16 MP 16 MP
    Photo resolution 4608x3456 pixels 3456x4608 pixels
    Aperture f/2.5 f/2.5
    Sensor CMOS CMOS
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display    		 - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.1 5.3
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG    		 - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort n/a No
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS    		 - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    NFC* Varies by region Yes
    Infrared Port No Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800MHzn/a
    3G BandsWCDMA B1/B5/B8n/a
    LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B40)n/a
    LTE category13n/a
    5G SupportNoYes

    Sound

    Speakers Mono n/a
    3.5 mm Jack Yes No
    FM Radio Yes No
    Dolby Atmos No No

    Other

    Class Mid-range Mid-range
    Announced May, 2023 yr September, 2025 yr
    Release Date May, 2023 yr October, 2025 yr
    Launch Price ($) 220 n/a
    MSRP ($) n/a 350
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor    		 - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 44 W Yes, 66 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Honor X9d the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    1 (100%)
    Total Votes: 1

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below