Xiaomi 13 vs Oppo Find X9s Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi 13 Manufactured in December, 2022, with display 6.36 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, vs Oppo Find X9s Pro, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 13
- Larger display: 6.36in
- Lighter design: 189g vs 198g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9s Pro
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7025mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.1 vs 5.3
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.36 in | 6.32 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1900 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4 % | 90.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.6 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 488 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 152.8 mm (6.02 in) | 150.5 mm (5.93 in) |
| Width | 71.5 mm (2.81 in) | 71.7 mm (2.82 in) |
| Thickness | 7.98 mm (0.31 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- White - Gray - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1974 | 3302 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5320 | 10598 |
| CPU | 378705 | 975847 |
| GPU | 601199 | 1334740 |
| Memory | 291189 | 388222 |
| UX | 281474 | 641387 |
| NanoReview Score | 1552567 | 3340196 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 34.9 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 84 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 75 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 12660 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 31.5 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 4500 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (83% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:42 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 09:47 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:15 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:57 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 127 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.2x | Optical, 2.8x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 1920 fps (1080p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 10 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX800 | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.49 | 1/1.4 (0.71) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 10 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 75 mm | 65 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.75 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 55 | n/a |
| Preview | 68 | n/a |
| Zoom | 131 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32C | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | n/a |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900 MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA: B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | December, 2022 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2022 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 999 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 780 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9s Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1