Xiaomi 14 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi 14 Ultra Manufactured in February, 2024, with display 6.73 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro, Manufactured in January, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.73in
- Higher pixel density: 522ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Lighter design: 186g vs 219.8g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.73 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1220x2712 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 522 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (30-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.9 % | 99.7 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | 1923 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.4 mm (6.35 in) | 160.45 mm (6.32 in) |
| Width | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) | 74.34 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm (0.36 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 219.8 g (7.75 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP54 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Gray - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2197 | 1502 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7058 | 4779 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 16435 | 4842 |
| CPU | 436541 | 296205 |
| GPU | 840663 | 539596 |
| Memory | 431435 | 318606 |
| UX | 328880 | 252803 |
| NanoReview Score | 2019519 | 1407210 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 47.7 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 86 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 92 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 15437 | n/a |
| Writing score | 19642 | n/a |
| Web score | 14876 | n/a |
| Video editing | 7929 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 15903 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 16417 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | 31 GB | 36 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (80 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (52% in 15 min) | Yes (50% in 18 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:34 h | 0:45 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:23 h | 08:53 h |
| Video Playback | 12:26 h | 12:36 h |
| Games | 04:35 h | 05:17 h |
| Standby Mode | 109 h | 101 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 9000x7000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 1920 fps (1080p) | 1920 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 122 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Depth |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 - 4.0 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-900 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.0 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Focal length | 120 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX858 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.51 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX858 | Omnivision OV08D10 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.51 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 75 | n/a |
| Preview | 83 | n/a |
| Zoom | 160 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32B | Omnivision OV16A1Q |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | January, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2024 yr | January, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1499 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 299 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 67 W |
Note
Xiaomi 14 Ultra:
The rear cover is available in glass or eco-leather, while the frame can be aluminum or titanium. The front glass is either Xiaomi Shield Glass or Xiaomi Longjing Glass.
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro:
There is an eco-leather version of the X6 Pro that is 4 grams heavier and 0.10 thicker.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi 14 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0