Xiaomi 14 vs Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi 14 Manufactured in November, 2023, with display 6.36 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, Manufactured in June, 2019with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 855. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 14
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 4610mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Larger display: 6.39in
- Lighter design: 191g vs 193g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.36 in | 6.39 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2670 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4 % | 86.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 99.6 % | 142.2 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 429 Hz | 223 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 6.5 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 152.8 mm (6.02 in) | 156.7 mm (6.17 in) |
| Width | 71.5 mm (2.81 in) | 74.3 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Green - Pink |
- White - Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.84 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 690 |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 585 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 898.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2182 | 933 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 6991 | 2405 |
| CPU | 452780 | 200133 |
| GPU | 851183 | 193659 |
| Memory | 411673 | 104050 |
| UX | 315477 | 123595 |
| NanoReview Score | 2031113 | 621437 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 47.9 °C | 44.1 °C |
| Stability | 70 % | 88 % |
| Graphics Test | 92 fps | 18 fps |
| Graphics Score | 15419 | 3022 |
| Writing score | 19653 | 11471 |
| Web score | 15768 | 7040 |
| Video editing | 7891 | 5961 |
| Data manipulation | 16120 | 8050 |
| NanoReview Score | 16364 | 9555 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | 28 GB | 19 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | MIUI 12.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 4610 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 27 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (58% in 15 min) | Yes Quick Charge 4+ (40% in 20 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:35 h | 1:11 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:59 h | 07:54 h |
| Video Playback | 17:04 h | 12:39 h |
| Games | 05:15 h | 04:50 h |
| Standby Mode | 111 h | 109 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.2x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 1920 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 115 ° | 124 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OVX9000 Light Fusion 900 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 75 mm | 53 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Omnivision OV8856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5K3L6 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 55 | n/a |
| Preview | 73 | n/a |
| Zoom | 134 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 5184x3880 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32B | Samsung S5K3T2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3 | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66) | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | 20 | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2023 yr | May, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2023 yr | June, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 999 | 450 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi 14 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1