Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus
85
out 100
VS
65
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi 14T Pro Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus, vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus, Manufactured in March, 2020 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9 Octa 990. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher pixel density: 524ppi
- Lighter design: 186g vs 209g
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 12/1024 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 12/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 pixels | 1440x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 524 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-144 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 99.7 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | 214 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 9 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.4 mm (6.31 in) | 161.9 mm (6.37 in) |
| Width | 75.1 mm (2.96 in) | 73.7 mm (2.9 in) |
| Thickness | 8.39 mm (0.33 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 990 |
| Max Frequency | 3400 MHz | 3020 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A76) - 2/2.73 (Exynos M5) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G77 MP11 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 704 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 550 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 1126 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2155 | 1152 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7116 | 3140 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 13972 | n/a |
| CPU | 501362 | 210294 |
| GPU | 887075 | 235407 |
| Memory | 369880 | 128971 |
| UX | 296456 | 168138 |
| NanoReview Score | 2054773 | 742810 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 48.1 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 53 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 25 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 4298 |
| Writing score | n/a | 13668 |
| Web score | n/a | 8813 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5865 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 8637 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 11179 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 50 GB | 23.6 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | One UI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (74% in 15 min) | Yes (100% in 84 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:23 h | 1:25 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:46 h | 07:39 h |
| Video Playback | 14:07 h | 12:04 h |
| Games | 05:33 h | 04:46 h |
| Standby Mode | 92 h | 85 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.6x | Optical, 1.1x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Light Fusion 900 | Samsung S5K2LD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.3 | 1/1.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | 1.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 50 mm | 29 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung Bright S5KGW2 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/1.72 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B | Samsung S5K2LA |
| Sensor size | 1/3 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 55 | 70 |
| Preview | 67 | 72 |
| Zoom | 144 | 126 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 10 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6560x4928 pixels | 2592x3872 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL KD1 | Sony IMX375 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/3.2 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | LTE (B850/B900/B1700/B1900/B2100) |
| LTE category | n/a | 22 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | February, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2024 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 697 | 1200 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi 14T Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
