Xiaomi Mi 10 vs Honor X9d
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Mi 10 Manufactured in June, 2020, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865, vs Honor X9d, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 10
Reasons to choose Honor X9d
- Larger display: 6.79in
- Higher pixel density: 427ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 193g vs 208g
- Higher battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 4780mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/256 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.79 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1200x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.85:9 |
| Pixel density | 386 ppi | 427 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.8 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 362 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.6 mm (6.4 in) | 161.9 mm (6.37 in) |
| Width | 74.8 mm (2.94 in) | 76.1 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- Black - Gold - Green - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.2 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.3 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 698 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 650 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 587 MHz | 895 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1202.1 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1217 | 1086 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3366 | 3103 |
| CPU | 229483 | 358049 |
| GPU | 194403 | 160718 |
| Memory | 135248 | 210830 |
| UX | 173573 | 247707 |
| NanoReview Score | 732707 | 977304 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 42.8 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 26 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 4409 | n/a |
| Writing score | 14234 | n/a |
| Web score | 8296 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6565 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 8803 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 11410 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 19 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 4780 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 30 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:05 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:49 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:13 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 95 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung Bright S5KHMX | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.33 | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX350 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3456x4608 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3T2 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.9 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4(1700/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B2100)) | n/a |
| LTE category | 22 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2020 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2020 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 800 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 350 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 66 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor X9d the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0