Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro Manufactured in December, 2020, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865, vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
- Lighter design: 218g vs 219g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 447ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7410mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1280x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 630 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 90 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 97.9 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 2358 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 42.2 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1252:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.1 mm (6.5 in) | 163.4 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) | 77.9 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm (0.37 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Blue |
- White - Gray - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2840 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 698 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 650 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 587 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1202.1 GFLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1263 | 2676 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3482 | 8922 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 23887 |
| CPU | 222519 | 612803 |
| GPU | 194682 | 1209263 |
| Memory | 140261 | 643114 |
| UX | 184083 | 516680 |
| NanoReview Score | 741545 | 2981860 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 41.5 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 22 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3799 | n/a |
| Writing score | 13489 | n/a |
| Web score | 6810 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5610 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6940 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9993 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2750 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 19.5 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7410 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (61% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:58 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 10:54 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:36 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:58 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 125 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12032x9024 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP Macro: 5 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHMX | Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.33 | 1/1.55 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B10 | Omnivision OV08F |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5963x3354 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3T2 | Omnivision OV20B |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | n/a |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 22 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2020 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2020 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 710 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 900 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0