Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra
66
out 100
VS
96
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Manufactured in April, 2021, with display 6.81 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888, vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 515ppi
- Lighter design: 205g vs 235g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7050mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.81 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| Pixel density | 515 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 900 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.4 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.3 mm (6.47 in) | 163.16 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) | 76.97 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 8.65 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 235 g (8.29 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Green - Purple |
- White - Green - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2840 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)) |
- 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance) - 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 780 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 660 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1290.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1461 | 3646 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3910 | 11276 |
| CPU | 242692 | 1166693 |
| GPU | 263225 | 1523262 |
| Memory | 174582 | 509363 |
| UX | 223963 | 886789 |
| NanoReview Score | 904462 | 4086107 |
| Stability | 90 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 30 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 5153 | n/a |
| Writing score | 15135 | n/a |
| Web score | 11250 | n/a |
| Video editing | 7600 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 8595 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 12141 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2750 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7050 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (67 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 15 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:37 h | 0:45 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 16:45 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 26:15 h |
| Games | n/a | 08:23 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 144 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8700x5800 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 10x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 1920 fps (1080p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung GN2 | Sony LYTIA-901 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12 | 1/1.12 (0.89) |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 120 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08A10 | OmniVision OV52A |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4 | 1/1.28 (0.78) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08A10 | Sony LYTIA-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4 | 1/1.95 (0.51) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 64 | n/a |
| Zoom | 117 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5380x3620 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3T2 | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/2.75 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900 MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | 24 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2021 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2021 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1099 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
