Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro vs Vivo X300 FE
51
out 100
VS
92
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Manufactured in June, 2019, with display 6.39 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 855, vs Vivo X300 FE, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Larger display: 6.39in
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 FE
- Higher pixel density: 461ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 190g vs 191g
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 16/1024 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.39 in | 6.31 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | Always-On Display | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 142.2 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 223 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 6.5 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.7 mm (6.17 in) | 150.83 mm (5.94 in) |
| Width | 74.3 mm (2.93 in) | 71.76 mm (2.83 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Red |
- White - Black - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.84 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) |
6/3.32 () |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 690 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 640 | Adreno 829 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 585 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| FLOPS | 898.5 GFLOPS | 2457.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 933 | 2818 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2405 | 9052 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 16659 |
| CPU | 200133 | 861821 |
| GPU | 193659 | 1005345 |
| Memory | 104050 | 381541 |
| UX | 123595 | 620432 |
| NanoReview Score | 621437 | 2869139 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.1 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 88 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 18 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3022 | n/a |
| Writing score | 11471 | n/a |
| Web score | 7040 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5961 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 8050 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9555 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 19 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 27 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes Quick Charge 4+ (40% in 20 min) | Yes (48% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:11 h | 0:58 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:54 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:39 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:50 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 109 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 124 ° | 110 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX586 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 53 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV8856 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/1.95 (0.51) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3L6 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5184x3880 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3T2 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May, 2019 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2019 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 450 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
