Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
51
out 100
VS
90
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Manufactured in June, 2019, with display 6.39 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 855, vs Vivo X300 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Lighter design: 191g vs 226g
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6510mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.39 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | Always-On Display | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 142.2 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 223 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 6.5 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.7 mm (6.17 in) | 161.98 mm (6.38 in) |
| Width | 74.3 mm (2.93 in) | 75.48 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Red |
- White - Black - Blue - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2840 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.84 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 690 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 640 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 585 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 898.5 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 933 | 3447 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2405 | 10378 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25723 |
| CPU | 200133 | 1043247 |
| GPU | 193659 | 1510982 |
| Memory | 104050 | 667254 |
| UX | 123595 | 790449 |
| NanoReview Score | 621437 | 4011932 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.1 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 88 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 18 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3022 | n/a |
| Writing score | 11471 | n/a |
| Web score | 7040 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5961 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 8050 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9555 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 19 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 27 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes Quick Charge 4+ (40% in 20 min) | Yes (55% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:11 h | 0:29 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:54 h | 08:45 h |
| Video Playback | 12:39 h | 14:55 h |
| Games | 04:50 h | 06:08 h |
| Standby Mode | 109 h | 81 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 124 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX586 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 53 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV8856 | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3L6 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5184x3880 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3T2 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 450 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 899 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
