Xiaomi Poco C71 vs Honor X8d
52
out 100
VS
64
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco C71 Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.88 with chipsetUnisoc T7250, vs Honor X8d, Manufactured in December, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C71
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Reasons to choose Honor X8d
- Higher pixel density: 388ppi
- Lighter design: 188g vs 193g
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5200mAh
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.88 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 1080x2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.85:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5 % | 89.5 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 171.79 mm (6.76 in) | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) | 76.3 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.9 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 437 | 907 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1438 | 2010 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 708 | n/a |
| CPU | 92232 | 137290 |
| GPU | 30830 | 49652 |
| Memory | 78630 | 116500 |
| UX | 78630 | 110055 |
| NanoReview Score | 270293 | 413497 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | n/a |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Android Go | MagicOS 10 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | n/a |
| Fast Charging | Yes (24% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:32 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 240 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 32 MP Depth |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 32 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung HM6 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.67 (0.6) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3456x4608 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 70 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 15 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor X8d the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
