Xiaomi Poco C71 vs Tecno Camon 50 4G
52
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco C71 Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.88 with chipsetUnisoc T7250, vs Tecno Camon 50 4G, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C71
- Larger display: 6.88in
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 4G
- Higher pixel density: 429ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 172g vs 193g
- Higher battery capacity: 6150mAh vs 5200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.88 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 171.79 mm (6.76 in) | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 437 | 746 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1438 | 2020 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 708 | n/a |
| CPU | 92232 | 131686 |
| GPU | 30830 | 72057 |
| Memory | 78630 | 110256 |
| UX | 78630 | 119058 |
| NanoReview Score | 270293 | 433057 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | Android Go | HIOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (24% in 30 min) | Yes (44% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:32 h | 1:18 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 32 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 14 mm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 70 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 15 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 50 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
