Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Samsung Galaxy A02
52
out 100
VS
33
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco C75 Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.88 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, vs Samsung Galaxy A02, Manufactured in January, 2021 with chipsetMediatek MT6739W. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C75
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 204g vs 206g
- Higher battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A02
- Higher pixel density: 270ppi
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/32 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS TFT |
| Size | 6.88 in | 6.5 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5 % | 82 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 171.88 mm (6.77 in) | 164 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.22 mm (0.32 in) | 9.1 mm (0.36 in) |
| Weight | 204 g (7.2 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Green |
- Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Mediatek MT6739W |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 4 (4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
4/1.5 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 8 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 570 MHz |
| FLOPS | 91.2 GFLOPS | 9.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 408 | 470 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1330 | 1525 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 910 | n/a |
| CPU | 83087 | 50286 |
| GPU | 35448 | 6591 |
| Memory | 75682 | 34538 |
| UX | 80158 | 39957 |
| NanoReview Score | 274375 | 131372 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
2 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | n/a | 9.4 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | One UI Core 3.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | n/a |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 2:16 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6144 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth |
Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 28 mm | n/a |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 2560x1960 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | UMTS B1 (2100), B5(850), B8 (900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 147 | 100 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 10 W |
Note
Xiaomi Poco C75:
Xiaomi Poco C75 is rebranding of the Redmi 14C.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco C75 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
