Home Phone comparison Xiaomi Poco C75 and Vivo X200 Pro mini - Which is better?

Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Vivo X200 Pro mini

52 out 100
Xiaomi Poco C75
VS
91 out 100
Vivo X200 Pro mini
Xiaomi Poco C75
Vivo X200 Pro mini

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco C75 Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.88 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, vs Vivo X200 Pro mini, Manufactured in October, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C75
  • Larger display: 6.88in
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro mini
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Lighter design: 187g vs 204g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5700mAh vs 5160mAh
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 6/128 GB
- 8/256 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Poco C75 and Vivo X200 Pro mini
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Xiaomi Poco C75
vs
Vivo X200 Pro mini

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD AMOLED
Size 6.88 in 6.31 in
Resolution 720x1640 pixels 1216x2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 260 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 600 nits n/a
HDR support No Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 85.5 % 90.3 %
Features n/a - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Xiaomi Poco C75
n/a
Vivo X200 Pro mini
1803 nits
sRGB gamutn/a99.8 %
PWM (Flicker)n/a361 Hz
Response timen/a1 ms
Contrastn/a∞ Infinite
Sources: NotebookCheck [Vivo X200 Pro mini]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 171.88 mm (6.77 in) 150.8 mm (5.94 in)
Width 77.8 mm (3.06 in) 71.8 mm (2.83 in)
Thickness 8.22 mm (0.32 in) 8.2 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 204 g (7.2 oz) 187 g (6.6 oz)
Water resistance No IP69
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - Black
- Gold
- Green		 - White
- Black
- Green
- Pink
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Poco C75
85.5 %
Vivo X200 Pro mini
90.3 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Poco C75 and Vivo X200 Pro mini In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Max Frequency 2000 MHz 3620 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2 (Cortex-A75)		 - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 12 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor Yes MediaTek NPU 890
Graphics Mali-G52 MP2 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores 48 1536
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS 91.2 GFLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Poco C75
408
Vivo X200 Pro mini
2696
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Poco C75
1330
Vivo X200 Pro mini
8536
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)4082696
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)13308536
Geekbench Compute (GPU)910n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Xiaomi Poco C75], [Vivo X200 Pro mini]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Poco C75
274375
Vivo X200 Pro mini
2452559
CPU83087550000
GPU354481124744
Memory75682382394
UX80158395421
NanoReview Score2743752452559

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 6 GB
- 8 GB		 - 12 GB
- 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 1800 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 128 GB
- 256 GB		- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
Storage TypeeMMC 5.1UFS 4.0
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
OS Size n/a 55 GB
UI Skin HyperOS 2.0 OriginOS 5

Battery

Volume 5160 mAh 5700 mAh
Max Charging Power 18 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (30 W)
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 60 min) Yes (62% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:16 h 0:52 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Xiaomi Poco C75
n/a
Vivo X200 Pro mini
28:40
Web Browsingn/a11:58 h
Video Playbackn/a18:31 h
Gamesn/a05:59 h
Standby Moden/a131 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8160x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens n/a 119 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Depth		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features Bokeh effect - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Focal length28 mm23 mm
Sensorn/aSony LYT-818
Sensor sizen/a1/1.28
Pixel sizen/a1.22 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationDigitalOptical
Telephoto
Matrixn/a50 MP
Aperturen/af/2.6
Focal lengthn/a70 mm
Sensorn/aSony IMX882
Sensor sizen/a1/1.95
Pixel sizen/a0.7 μm
Stabilizationn/aOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a50 MP
Aperturen/af/2.0
Focal lengthn/a15 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung S5KJN1
Sensor sizen/a1/2.76
Pixel sizen/a0.64 μm
Stabilizationn/aDigital

Front camera

Matrix 13 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution n/a 6528x4896 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length n/a 20 mm
Sensor CMOS Samsung KD1
Sensor size n/a 1/3.44
Autofocus No n/a
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 2/3/5/8n/a
3G BandsWCDMA B1/2/4/5/8n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66)n/a
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Mono Stereo
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos No n/a
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Xiaomi Poco C75
n/a
Vivo X200 Pro mini
85.7 dB

Other

Class Budget Flagship
Announced October, 2024 yr October, 2024 yr
Release Date November, 2024 yr October, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 147 650
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included No Yes 90 W

Note

Xiaomi Poco C75:

Xiaomi Poco C75 is rebranding of the Redmi 14C.

* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro mini the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below