Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Infinix Note 30 VIP
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Infinix Note 30 VIP, Manufactured in June, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8050. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Higher pixel density: 526ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 30 VIP
- Lighter design: 190g vs 212g
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 526 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4 % | 87 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.26 mm (6.31 in) | 162.7 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 74.95 mm (2.95 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.39 mm (0.33 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Yellow |
- White - Black |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
| Max Frequency | 4320 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A78) - 1/3 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 570 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Mali-G77 MP9 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 576 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 979.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2858 | 1102 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8690 | 3287 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 22968 | n/a |
| CPU | 523392 | 213667 |
| GPU | 1059245 | 218364 |
| Memory | 477813 | 154506 |
| UX | 449320 | 187269 |
| NanoReview Score | 2509770 | 773806 |
| Stability | n/a | 96 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 27 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 4531 |
| Writing score | n/a | 21651 |
| Web score | n/a | 13010 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6544 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 9816 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 14636 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | XOS 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 5300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 68 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (60% in 15 min) | Yes (65% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:30 h | 0:56 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:26 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:46 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:40 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 124 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 1920 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 32 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 | Samsung HM6 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.55 | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Focal length | 60 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 32 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | n/a | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8/6/19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 649 | 280 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 68 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0