Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Vivo X200 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
  • Higher pixel density: 526ppi
  • Lighter design: 212g vs 228g
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro
  • Larger display: 6.78in
  • Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5300mAh
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Built-in eSIM
  • Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Vivo X200 Pro
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1440x3200 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 526 ppi 452 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 1800 nits 2000 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 480 Hz 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 89.4 % 90.1 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
1583 nits
Vivo X200 Pro
2028 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.26 mm (6.31 in) 162.36 mm (6.39 in)
Width 74.95 mm (2.95 in) 75.92 mm (2.99 in)
Thickness 8.39 mm (0.33 in) 8.49 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 212 g (7.48 oz) 228 g (8.04 oz)
Water resistance IP68 IP69
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel Glass Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Black
- Yellow
- White
- Black
- Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
89.4 %
Vivo X200 Pro
90.1 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Vivo X200 Pro In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Max Frequency 4320 MHz 3630 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M))
- 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L))
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon MediaTek NPU 890
Graphics Adreno 830 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores 1536 1536
GPU Frequency 1100 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS 3379.2 GFLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
2858
Vivo X200 Pro
2848
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
8690
Vivo X200 Pro
8363
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)28582848
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)86908363
Geekbench Compute (GPU)2296824447
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
2509770
Vivo X200 Pro
2647012
CPU523392600293
GPU10592451194784
Memory477813408283
UX449320443652
NanoReview Score25097702647012
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
n/a
Vivo X200 Pro
18771
Stabilityn/a55 %
Graphics Testn/a112 fps
Graphics Scoren/a18771
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
n/a
Vivo X200 Pro
15826
Writing scoren/a24851
Web scoren/a14035
Video editingn/a5794
Data manipulationn/a13748
NanoReview Scoren/a15826

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB
- 12 GB
- 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin HyperOS 2.0 Funtouch OS 15

Battery

Volume 5300 mAh 6000 mAh
Max Charging Power 120 W 90 W
Battery Type n/a Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (50 W) Yes (30 W)
Reverse Charging n/a Yes
Fast Charging Yes (60% in 15 min) Yes (73% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:30 h 0:46 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
25:23
Vivo X200 Pro
24:55
Web Browsing10:26 h12:47 h
Video Playback14:46 h16:41 h
Games05:40 h07:44 h
Standby Mode124 h85 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Optical, 3.7x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording Up to 24FPS Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 1920 fps (720p) 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 120 ° 119 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 32 MP
Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Focal length24 mm23 mm
SensorOmnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800Sony LYT-818
Sensor size1/1.551/1.28
Pixel size1 μm1.22 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocus (Dual Pixel)Laser autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MP200 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.7
Focal length60 mm85 mm
SensorSamsung S5KJN5Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size1/2.761/1.4
Pixel size0.64 μm0.56 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix32 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.0
Focal length15 mm15 mm
SensorSamsung S5KKD1Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size1/3.441/2.76
Pixel size0.7 μm0.64 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 6528x4896 pixels
Aperture n/a f/2.0
Focal length n/a 20 mm
Sensor CMOS Samsung S5KKD1
Sensor size n/a 1/3.42
Pixel size n/a 0.64 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version n/a 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 2/3/5/8GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/4/5/8/6/19WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced March, 2025 yr October, 2024 yr
Release Date April, 2025 yr October, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 649 847
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included No Yes 90 W

Note

Vivo X200 Pro:

The black model is thinner (8.2) and lighter (223g).

* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
2 (50%)
2 (50%)
Total Votes: 4

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below