Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
86
out 100
VS
49
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, Manufactured in May, 2020 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Higher pixel density: 526ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 5020mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
- Lighter design: 209g vs 212g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 526 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4 % | 84.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 2404 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 35.2 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1649:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.26 mm (6.31 in) | 165.8 mm (6.53 in) |
| Width | 74.95 mm (2.95 in) | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.39 mm (0.33 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Yellow |
- White - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G |
| Max Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.3 (Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 8 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 692 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Adreno 618 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 750 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 384 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2858 | 719 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8690 | 1874 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 22968 | n/a |
| CPU | 523392 | 139577 |
| GPU | 1059245 | 73153 |
| Memory | 477813 | 72832 |
| UX | 449320 | 104277 |
| NanoReview Score | 2509770 | 389839 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 42.3 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 6 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 1044 |
| Writing score | n/a | 9643 |
| Web score | n/a | 6022 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5453 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6923 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 8136 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | n/a | 18.9 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | MIUI 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 5300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (60% in 15 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:30 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:26 h | 10:27 h |
| Video Playback | 14:46 h | 13:57 h |
| Games | 05:40 h | 05:33 h |
| Standby Mode | 124 h | 143 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 9248x6920 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 1920 fps (720p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 32 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 | Samsung Bright S5KGW1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.55 | 1/1.72 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Focal length | 60 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | GalaxyCore GC8034 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.48 |
| Sensor | CMOS | OmniVision OV32A1Q |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | n/a | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8/6/19 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | n/a | 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | May, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 649 | 185 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
