Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A71
90
out 100
VS
45
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Manufactured in November, 2025, with display 6.59 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Samsung Galaxy A71, Manufactured in February, 2020 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 730. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 419ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6210mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A71
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Lighter design: 179g vs 199g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1156x2510 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 419 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 2000 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90 % | 87.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 98.2 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 247 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 3.8 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 157.5 mm (6.2 in) | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 75.2 mm (2.96 in) | 76 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Blue |
- Black - Silver - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 |
| Max Frequency | 4470 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 470 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 470 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 8 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Qualcomm Hexagon 688 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Adreno 618 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 700 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 358.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2292 | 690 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8487 | 1826 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24733 | n/a |
| CPU | 922812 | 130125 |
| GPU | 1141906 | 70365 |
| Memory | 416794 | 65296 |
| UX | 605144 | 93626 |
| NanoReview Score | 3086656 | 360125 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 37.5 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 97 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 740 |
| Writing score | n/a | 8417 |
| Web score | n/a | 5183 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5492 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6022 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 7257 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5300 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | n/a | 23.8 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 3 | One UI 5.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6210 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (80% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 35 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:39 h | 1:22 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:55 h | 07:51 h |
| Video Playback | 21:09 h | 12:54 h |
| Games | 07:36 h | 04:49 h |
| Standby Mode | 122 h | 107 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 9000x7000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 | Samsung Bright S5KGW1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.55 (0.65) | 1/1.7 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.0 | n/a |
| Focal length | 60 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50M | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 (0.36) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08F | n/a |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KGD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 (0.5) | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | n/a | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Active |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | UMTS B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8 (900) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2025 yr | December, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2025 yr | February, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 350 |
| MSRP ($) | 535 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 100 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
