Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Tecno Pova 7 Neo
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco M3 Manufactured in December, 2020, with display 6.53 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662, vs Tecno Pova 7 Neo, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco M3
- Lighter design: 198g vs 203g
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 396ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.53 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1080x2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 21:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 440 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4 % | 83.1 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 96.5 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 892 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 36 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 2214:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) | 168.6 mm (6.64 in) |
| Width | 77.3 mm (3.04 in) | 76.6 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm (0.38 in) | 9.3 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Yellow |
- Black - Silver - Gold - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 11 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 683 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 511 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1552 | 1976 |
| CPU | 86953 | 133817 |
| GPU | 34960 | 72467 |
| Memory | 60136 | 110951 |
| UX | 61429 | 121869 |
| NanoReview Score | 243478 | 439104 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 39.9 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 372 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6713 | n/a |
| Web score | 5503 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3632 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5147 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6158 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 20.5 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 Enhanced | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 3:00 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 11:51 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:49 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:39 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 155 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) | |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | November, 2020 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2020 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 150 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 180 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 7 Neo the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0