Xiaomi Poco M6 4G vs Honor 400 Lite
48
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco M6 4G Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 6.79 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, vs Honor 400 Lite, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco M6 4G
- Larger display: 6.79in
- Higher pixel density: 396ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor 400 Lite
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 161g vs 205g
- Higher battery capacity: 5230mAh vs 5030mAh
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.79 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20.1:9 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 3500 nits |
| HDR support | No | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 168.6 mm (6.64 in) | 161 mm (6.34 in) |
| Width | 76.28 mm (3 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Water resistance | n/a | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | n/a |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Purple |
- Black - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 144 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 274 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 441 | 956 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1390 | 2303 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 143 |
| CPU | 71263 | 161440 |
| GPU | 40845 | 78966 |
| Memory | 71011 | 116384 |
| UX | 76520 | 140445 |
| NanoReview Score | 259639 | 497235 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 18 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5030 mAh | 5230 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung HM6 | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67 | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.45 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2024 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2024 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 299 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 0 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
