Xiaomi Poco M7 4G vs Tecno Pova 2
58
out 100
VS
44
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco M7 4G Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 6.9 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Tecno Pova 2, Manufactured in June, 2021 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco M7 4G
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 2
- Higher pixel density: 389ppi
- Lighter design: 207g vs 224g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.9 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1080x2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 374 ppi | 389 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 850 nits | 480 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8 % | 82.9 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 171.1 mm (6.74 in) | 173.3 mm (6.82 in) |
| Width | 80.5 mm (3.17 in) | 78.8 mm (3.1 in) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) | 9.6 mm (0.38 in) |
| Weight | 224 g (7.9 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 455 | 519 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1519 | 1565 |
| CPU | 115622 | 85473 |
| GPU | 42244 | 39924 |
| Memory | 104837 | 64027 |
| UX | 95819 | 75795 |
| NanoReview Score | 358522 | 265219 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 716 |
| Writing score | n/a | 8903 |
| Web score | n/a | 6915 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6103 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6304 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 8217 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | HIOS 7.6 |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 90 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 3:30 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth |
Standard: 48 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B48) |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | June, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | June, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 150 |
| MSRP ($) | 110 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 33 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco M7 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
