Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G vs Honor 90 Lite
60
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, vs Honor 90 Lite, Manufactured in June, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5110mAh vs 4500mAh
Reasons to choose Honor 90 Lite
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Lighter design: 179g vs 190g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/256 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2388 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.9:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1200 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3 % | 89.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 75.7 mm (2.98 in) | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) | 7.48 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Purple |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 937 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2248 | 1927 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 135 | n/a |
| CPU | 163523 | 135029 |
| GPU | 95694 | 62888 |
| Memory | 108064 | 103707 |
| UX | 134293 | 101222 |
| NanoReview Score | 501574 | 402846 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | n/a | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | MagicOS 7.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5110 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes (55% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:08 h | 1:52 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 100 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 11584x8688 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 100 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 100 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | n/a | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28/B40/B41) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | December, 2024 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2024 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 170 | 300 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes 35 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
