Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
60
out 100
VS
70
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G, Manufactured in August, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
- Lighter design: 190g vs 211g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 443ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5110mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1220x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 443 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1200 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3 % | 86.8 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 75.7 mm (2.98 in) | 78.1 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Purple |
- White - Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 937 | 1029 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2248 | 2915 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 135 | n/a |
| CPU | 163523 | 224809 |
| GPU | 95694 | 179080 |
| Memory | 108064 | 132205 |
| UX | 134293 | 172330 |
| NanoReview Score | 501574 | 708424 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | n/a | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5110 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:08 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | n/a | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28/B40/B41) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | December, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 170 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
