Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Oppo Find X3 Pro
55
out 100
VS
65
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Manufactured in April, 2021, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 860, vs Oppo Find X3 Pro, Manufactured in March, 2021 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Higher battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 4500mAh
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher pixel density: 525ppi
- Lighter design: 193g vs 215g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/125 GB - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1440x3216 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 525 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6 % | 89.5 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 95.1 % | 98.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 2404 Hz | 362 Hz |
| Response time | 37.4 ms | 4.8 ms |
| Contrast | 995:1 | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.3 mm (6.51 in) | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) | 74 mm (2.91 in) |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm (0.37 in) | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Max Frequency | 2960 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.96 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime)) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 690 | Hexagon 780 |
| Graphics | Adreno 640 | Adreno 660 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 675 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1036.8 GFLOPS | 1290.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 973 | 1263 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2589 | 3476 |
| CPU | 181709 | 243663 |
| GPU | 155743 | 282654 |
| Memory | 126967 | 180301 |
| UX | 177878 | 219024 |
| NanoReview Score | 642297 | 925642 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.1 °C | 44.8 °C |
| Stability | 97 % | 58 % |
| Graphics Test | 20 fps | 34 fps |
| Graphics Score | 3456 | 5723 |
| Writing score | 13393 | 14657 |
| Web score | 8062 | 8620 |
| Video editing | 6035 | 6016 |
| Data manipulation | 8470 | 8718 |
| NanoReview Score | 10579 | 10839 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 13 GB | 19.1 GB |
| UI Skin | MIUI 14 | ColorOS 11.2 |
Battery
| Volume | 5160 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 65 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (55% in 30 min) | Yes SuperVOOC 3.0 (100% in 29 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:15 h | 0:29 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:43 h | 06:45 h |
| Video Playback | 12:45 h | 09:56 h |
| Games | 05:20 h | 04:33 h |
| Standby Mode | 117 h | 83 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | 8700x5800 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 110 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Macro: 3 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX582 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 13 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 52 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3M5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV8856 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 70 |
| Preview | n/a | 71 |
| Zoom | n/a | 102 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5480x3648 pixels | 6560x4928 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Sony IMX615 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTC B1/2/4/5/8 | UMTS 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | 20 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2021 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2021 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 250 | 1150 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X3 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
