Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra
54
out 100
VS
91
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G Manufactured in March, 2022, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Lighter design: 205g vs 227g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.85in
- Higher pixel density: 431ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7200mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.85 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1216x2688 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 431 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 700 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | 960 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9 % | 89.2 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 89.4 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 479 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.19 mm (6.46 in) | 164.5 mm (6.48 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.12 mm (0.32 in) | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 227 g (8.01 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Yellow |
- Black - Silver - Blue - Red - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
6/3.63 () |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 619 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 3686.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 916 | 3745 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2122 | 11971 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25473 |
| CPU | 144724 | 1193912 |
| GPU | 83265 | 1467832 |
| Memory | 98212 | 510664 |
| UX | 106667 | 912803 |
| NanoReview Score | 432868 | 4085211 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 38.1 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1200 | n/a |
| Writing score | 10885 | n/a |
| Web score | 7057 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4065 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 7763 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8274 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 26 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | NebulaAI OS 2 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (80 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | n/a |
| Fast Charging | Yes (75% in 30 min) | Yes (84% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:49 h | 0:42 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:50 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:38 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:34 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 110 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12032x9024 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2.7x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 118 ° | 122 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 35 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM2 | Omnivision OV990 Light and Shadow Master |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | 1/1.3 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.2 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 64 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/1.55 |
| Pixel size | 1.14 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV16A1Q | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 6, 19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 250 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 840 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
