Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Manufactured in February, 2023, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 778G, vs Vivo X300 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Lighter design: 181g vs 226g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6510mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.9 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.91 mm (6.41 in) | 161.98 mm (6.38 in) |
| Width | 76.03 mm (2.99 in) | 75.48 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Yellow |
- White - Black - Blue - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.4 (Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 770 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 642 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 512 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 844 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1022 | 3447 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2987 | 10378 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25723 |
| CPU | 202435 | 1043247 |
| GPU | 133636 | 1510982 |
| Memory | 126284 | 667254 |
| UX | 142691 | 790449 |
| NanoReview Score | 605046 | 4011932 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 36.4 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 14 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 2439 | n/a |
| Writing score | 14401 | n/a |
| Web score | 9947 | n/a |
| Video editing | 7004 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 9828 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 12020 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 31 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (82% in 30 min) | Yes (55% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:50 h | 0:29 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:45 h | 08:45 h |
| Video Playback | 13:29 h | 14:55 h |
| Games | 05:32 h | 06:08 h |
| Standby Mode | 102 h | 81 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12032x9024 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM2 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | n/a | 85 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K4H7 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV16A1Q | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2023 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2023 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 300 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 899 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0