Xiaomi Poco X5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco X5 Manufactured in February, 2023, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G, Manufactured in December, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X5
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Lighter design: 189g vs 195g
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
- Larger display: 6.77in
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 700 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | n/a |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 89.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.3 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 486 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.88 mm (6.53 in) | 163.2 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 76.21 mm (3 in) | 76.3 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 7.98 mm (0.31 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- Black - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 888 | 734 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1918 | 2008 |
| CPU | 155778 | 139717 |
| GPU | 81807 | 65836 |
| Memory | 96142 | 124991 |
| UX | 107004 | 117387 |
| NanoReview Score | 440731 | 447931 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 35.2 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1204 | n/a |
| Writing score | 12410 | n/a |
| Web score | 8418 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4684 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 8099 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9182 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 17 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (63% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:06 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 07:11 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:58 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:56 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 120 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 118 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV48B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/4 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4 | 1/4 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4208x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Samsung 3L6 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3 | 1/3 (0.33) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | n/a |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2023 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2023 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 250 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0