Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs Honor X7c
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, vs Honor X7c, Manufactured in October, 2024 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
- Higher pixel density: 446ppi
- Lighter design: 195g vs 201g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Larger display: 6.77in
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/256 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 pixels | 1610x720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1400 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.8 % | 86.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 99.6 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.75 mm (6.33 in) | 166.9 mm (6.57 in) |
| Width | 75.24 mm (2.96 in) | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.29 mm (0.33 in) | 8.24 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Green - Yellow |
- White - Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725) - 3/3 (Cortex-A725) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725) |
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 880 | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 MP7 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 896 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2329.6 GFLOPS | 319.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1595 | 474 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 6333 | 1531 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 10422 | 385 |
| CPU | 378096 | 115360 |
| GPU | 563744 | 43598 |
| Memory | 378539 | 121036 |
| UX | 303559 | 82690 |
| NanoReview Score | 1623938 | 362684 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | n/a |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | MagicOS 8.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 17 min) | Yes (50% in 39 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:42 h | 2:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:29 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:22 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:54 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 93 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.96 | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Smartsens SC820CS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5184x3888 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV20B | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | January, 2025 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2025 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 155 |
| MSRP ($) | 299 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 35 W |
Note
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro:
The eco-leather version is thicker at 8.43 and weighs 198 grams.
Honor X7c:
In black color, the smartphone is 8.09 thick and weighs 199g, while the green and white versions are 8.24 and 201g. Battery capacity varies by country: either 5,200 mAh or 6,000 mAh.","According to the official website, the Honor X7c can survive iersion up to 25 cm for no more than 3 minutes or 0.5 meters for up to 1 minute.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.