Xiaomi Pocophone F1 vs Vivo X300
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Manufactured in August, 2018, with display 6.18 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 845, vs Vivo X300, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pocophone F1
- Lighter design: 182g vs 190g
Reasons to choose Vivo X300
- Larger display: 6.31in
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6040mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.18 in | 6.31 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2246 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 18.7:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.5 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 2315 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 30.4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1438:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 155.5 mm (6.12 in) | 150.57 mm (5.93 in) |
| Width | 75.2 mm (2.96 in) | 71.92 mm (2.83 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 7.95 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Red |
- Black - Blue - Red - Pink - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 385 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 4/2.8 (Kryo 385 Gold (Cortex-A75)) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 685 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 630 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 512 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 710 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 727 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 823 | 3383 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2013 | 10099 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25462 |
| CPU | 130936 | 957632 |
| GPU | 158747 | 1342611 |
| Memory | 91990 | 448412 |
| UX | 84674 | 618759 |
| NanoReview Score | 466347 | 3367414 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 38.7 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 81 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 8 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1438 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9283 | n/a |
| Web score | 6776 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5933 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6438 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8464 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 8.1 (Upgradeable to Android 10) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 12 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12 POCO | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 6040 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes Quick Charge 3.0 (50% in 40 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | 0:46 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:45 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:43 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:37 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 95 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 240 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12 MP Depth: 5 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.68 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX363 | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-602 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5184x3880 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3T1 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.9 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 16 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | August, 2018 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2018 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 300 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 699 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0