Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs Infinix Hot 60 Pro 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 10C Manufactured in March, 2022, with display 6.71 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680, vs Infinix Hot 60 Pro 4G, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Reasons to choose Infinix Hot 60 Pro 4G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 170g vs 190g
- Higher battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.71 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1650 pixels | 1224x2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.6:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | No | n/a |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82 % | 89.4 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 93 % | n/a |
| Response time | 27 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1217:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 169.59 mm (6.68 in) | 163.5 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 76.56 mm (3.01 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.29 mm (0.33 in) | 6.6 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 170 g (6 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green |
- White - Black - Silver - Blue - Green - Pink - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 1114 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 284 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 409 | 732 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1368 | 2037 |
| CPU | 105426 | 136988 |
| GPU | 45445 | 77982 |
| Memory | 87616 | 118244 |
| UX | 70857 | 111612 |
| NanoReview Score | 309344 | 444826 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 40.6 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 90 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 441 | n/a |
| Writing score | 8470 | n/a |
| Web score | 6068 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3659 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5748 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6717 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 9 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 14 | XOS 15.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes (50% in 22 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:30 h | 0:44 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | OTG | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz | GSM (850/900/1800/1900) |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 | WCDMA (850/900/1900/2100) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B(B41/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B25352655)) | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 13 | 13 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2022 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2022 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 180 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 136 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix Hot 60 Pro 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0