Xiaomi Redmi 12C vs Tecno Pova Neo 3
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 12C Manufactured in January, 2023, with display 6.71 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Tecno Pova Neo 3, Manufactured in July, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 12C
- Higher pixel density: 268ppi
- Lighter design: 192g vs 201g
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova Neo 3
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.71 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 720x1650 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.6:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.6 % | 84.8 % |
| sRGB gamut | 96.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 30 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1191:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 168.76 mm (6.64 in) | 170.67 mm (6.72 in) |
| Width | 76.41 mm (3.01 in) | 77.6 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 8.77 mm (0.35 in) | 9.3 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green - Purple |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 407 | 430 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1269 | 1459 |
| CPU | 82825 | 83506 |
| GPU | 42471 | 50281 |
| Memory | 70316 | 56435 |
| UX | 71403 | 64772 |
| NanoReview Score | 267015 | 254994 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 45.8 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 97 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 725 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9971 | n/a |
| Web score | 7250 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6271 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5540 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8529 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
- 4 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| OS Size | 13 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 | HIOS 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (50% in 70 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:05 h | 2:30 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8150x6150 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.1 MP |
Standard: 16 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 7 | 7 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | December, 2022 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2023 yr | July, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 150 | 150 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova Neo 3 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0